|
4 –6 July 2005
Cambridge University
Judge Institute of Management
Process and Challenges
Stream Title: FLEXIBILITY
Stream Description:
Contemporary accounts depict
the future of work as flexible, mobile, temporary
and mediated by technology. According to some accounts, propagated by many
management gurus/consultants and promulgated in parts of the media,
organisations will have to become more and more ‘flexible’
in order to survive in
an increasingly global, transient and competitive market place: numerical and
functional flexibility decrease cost and result in a better match of skills and
tasks; structural flexibility allows for quick adaptation to environmental changes;
operational flexibility facilitates quick responses to changes in demand and
supply. Such overall organisational flexibility is to be matched on the individual
level, where individual employees are conceptualised as either being part of a
transient workforce to be drawn on or discarded as required by circumstances
and the logic of efficiency, or as autonomous entrepreneurs in charge of their
own (career) destiny, who trade their skill and expertise in flexible labour markets.
Within these accounts organizations
are seen as flexible networks, virtually
dispersed in time and space, so that work (and life) activity can be conducted
with anybody, at anytime and from anywhere. Organisational agents are
conceptualised as fluctuating between discontinuous states of being, ‘structures’
and contexts, and as able to make multiple fresh starts, notwithstanding
material, social and economic circumstance. Of course, such accounts have been
challenged, and been shown as problematic. Beck (2000) for example
investigates the redistribution of risk away from the state and the economy
towards the individual. Sennett (1998) describes the disappearance of character
in and through the expressants of flexible capitalism, i.e. teamworking
and
‘network’structures; this he sees concomitant with flexibility’s inability to give
guidance for the conduct of ordinary life. Giddens (1991), perhaps more
optimistically, sees individuals cast into freedom from tradition - an ontological
position that requires them to become authors of their own lives by keeping a
particular narrative of identity going.
Contributors to the stream
are invited to critically engage with the
ontological/epistemological assumptions of (discourses of) flexibility; the
consequences, opportunities and fallacies inherent in such flexible organization of
work and lives. We would like to hear accounts about those agents who
fluctuate between apparently increasingly permeable boundaries such as
immigrant workers/ refugees; displaced/resident working people,
housewives/househusbands; foreclosed/included employees; evolving/struggling
managers; budding/bankrupt entrepreneurs; people whose skills are becoming
obsolete/flourishing – as well as those caught in liminal positions
between such
categories.
Contributions based on
interpretive epistemologies are particularly welcome,
because of their ability to explore the construction of experience and the
attribution of meaning to flexible work and flexible lives. Such contributions might
consider ‘flexibility’ to be socially constructed and
therefore to be more
adequately described and explored as a process of ‘becoming’. Here, we wonder
if experience itself has become subject to fragmentation and disruption, or
whether in the flux of experience underlying and stable convictions have held
steady. Viewing flexibility as ‘lived experience’, such contributions might explore
the processes of how and why ‘flexibility’ has taken such a commanding hold in
the vocabulary and practice of management and organisation studies. Such
contributions might explore and comment on the consequences of ‘flexibility’ for
the emotional and cognitive dispositions of (organisational) agents, at different
levels and in different roles, as well as those of significant social others.
Translating such issues
into potential thematic contributions to the stream,
papers might explore:
The convenors welcome empirical
and/or theoretical papers, which engage
critically with the topic of flexibility. Our definition of ‘critical’
is inclusive of
various theoretical approaches/schools of thinking (e.g. Marxism; feminism;
postmodernism); of various ontologies or theoretical positions (e.g. social
constructionism; critical humanism) and of a variety of disciplines.
Potential contributors
are encouraged to contact us; in particular to discuss
possible contributions and ideas which are not listed above. We intend to be
flexible!
Process:
Each presentation will
take 20 minutes. Contributors are invited to present their
main ideasbriefly
and concisely in 10 minutes to allow for 10 minutes questions
per paper (in total per session: 80 minutes). We will be actively discouraging the
reiteration of the contents of a full paper, to enable the final 10 minutes of each
session to be used for reflection and conversation about issues and themes
which straddle the content of the individual contributions. We believe that this
use of time will enable more creative and critical thinking amongst the stream
participants.
References
Beck, U. (2000) The brave new world of work.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in
Late Modern
Age.Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sennett, R. (1998) The corrosion of character: The personal consequences
of
work in the new capitalism. London: W. W. Norton
& Company.
Convenors
Susanne Tietze
Senior Lecturer in Organisational Behaviour
Nottingham Business School
The Nottingham Trent University
Burton Street
UK Nottingham NG1 4BU
Tel.: ++44 115 848 2661
Email: susanne.tietze@ntu.ac.uk
Diannah Lowry
Senior Research Fellow
The National Institute for Labour Studies
Faculty of Social Sciences
Flinders University
Adelaide
Australia
Tel.: +61 8 8201 2265
Email: Diannah.Lowry@flinders.edu.au
Gill Musson
Lecturer in HRM and Organisational Behaviour
Sheffield University Management School
The University of Sheffield
9 Mappin Street
Sheffield S1 4DT UK
Tel.: +44 114 222 3437
Email: g.musson@sheffield.ac.uk
Julia Richardson
Assistant Professor of Organisational Behaviour
School of Administrative Studies
Atkinson Faculty
York University
Toronto
Ontario M3J 1L1
Canada
Tel.: +1 416 736 2100 ext. 33821
Email: jrichard@yorku.ca
Timeline:
Abstracts to Convenor (e-mail)
1 October 2004
Decisions on acceptance/rejection communicated 1 December 2004
Full papers to Convenor (e-mail)
1 April 2005
Abstracts should fit the following requirements:
-
Submissions in Word
- Arial Font
- Maximum Length 1000 words
- Including Title
|